- #Mackie onyx blackjack demo upgrade#
- #Mackie onyx blackjack demo full#
- #Mackie onyx blackjack demo software#
I'm looking for a good multi-track recording solution for home studio to record several separate instruments simultaneously each track in separate channel (no master out! ) for 8 channels, phantom power, 2 better 4 headphones, minimum 4 outputs, midi I/O. Well I m not sure about LIVE, maybe CUBASE or REAPER, but to begin, I have not yet fully decided on the device. The page about Ableton Live Intro (granted, version 9 and not 8) also lists two stereo inputs: Live Intro If I look at this page, it says Intro (which has more features than Lite) can only use two stereo inputs (so four channels) at the same time.
#Mackie onyx blackjack demo upgrade#
If you did want to upgrade to a full-featured version of Ableton, having the Lite version gives you a nice discount.
#Mackie onyx blackjack demo software#
What software are you going to use for multitrack recording? While I like Ableton Live a lot myself, I think the included version of Ableton only allows you to record six tracks at the same time. finally I decided to order and try Focusrite Scarlett 18i20
#Mackie onyx blackjack demo full#
They could never be as full featured as UA with their massive assortment of plug-in offerings, but there is a gap in the middle ground of great low latency, high dynamic range interfaces with onboard DSP capabilities that they could certainly exploit.Maxbau wrote:thank you for your answer. Something further than Metric Halo’s “console connect”. I can’t help but think that MOTU could give some companies a real run for it, if they’d focus on VST/AU development of UIs for their DSP processing.
The routing scheme is intuitive yet capable of the kind of complexity and flexibility that can do your head in if you aren’t focused. Stereo linking is simple, and all routing is internal. There is plenty DSP to run at least 32 EQs, HPFs, gates, and compressors. My only gripe is the LA-2A “Leveler” comp is only available on groups and busses. It just works, and I can control it with any computer or iOS device that is on my wireless network. I’ve been recording through the “British EQs” in the included DSP a good bit recently (was trying to make the most of what I have to resist a very good b-stock deal on a UA Arrow, it worked!). They’ve come far these past couple years with the AVB Mixer. I think in hindsight I may have purchased an RME which has way more flexible routing options and the software is far more advanced.Īlso consider MOTU if you ever decide to switch. One question: I know having a preamp in the Unison spot has all of the added impedance modeling advantages, but is it much better to have a whole channel strip (preamp, EQ, comp, etc) in the Unison spot? That’s the one thing that the Century definitely does that I can’t do with all of the stock plugins. I have plate covered for guitar with my Strymons, but it would be nice to have on my mic channel and as an insert. I’m definitely leaning toward getting the EMT140. Also, I don’t immediately see a big jump in results compared to the stock plugin combinations I have tried, although I intend to try it some more. I sort of have a feeling that if I bought it I would get lazy and not experiment with all of the other preamp, EQ, compressor combinations that came with the Arrow. I demoed the Century a bit yesterday after work, and will put it through the paces a bit more this weekend. The beauty is that it at least eliminates a lot of the plugins that require a lot of DSP power. Only having one SHARC processor in the Arrow is a blessing and a curse. They definitely do draw you in with the deals and coupons.
0 kommentar(er)
